Sexual Intelligence
An Electronic Newsletter
Written and published by Marty Klein, Ph.D.
Issue #76 -- June 2006
Contents
1. America--Land of Sex Maniacs?
2. The President; Clueless About Democracy
3. Gay Marriage, of Course
4. Dobson: Gay Marriage a "Force of Hell"
5. Court Ends U.S. ‘International Gag Rule'
6. Senate Demands More Indecency (Fines)
1. America--Land of Sex Maniacs?
Here's a fun activity to try: go outside the U.S. and listen
to people talk about Americans' sexual habits.
I've just returned from Turkey, Croatia, and Austria, and acquaintances and
colleagues in all three countries have the same image--that we are the world's
horniest people, doing it in the streets, eating porn for breakfast, committing
sex crimes for lunch, and skipping work to have orgies (which we videotape)
with Paris Hilton and Pamela Anderson.
When I informed people it wasn't quite that way, they were startled. So I pointed
to that week's issue of Croatia's national Globus Magazine, a cross between
Parade and Newsweek. The cover featured photos of celebrities,
news items, and a little one-inch shot of a barebreasted woman. You couldn't
do that in America, I said. Really?, they said.
OK, to really convince them, I said that in America:
They were amazed by all of it.
So am I.
2. The President; Clueless
About Democracy
Last week, President Bush again showed his dramatic ignorance
about democracy. As he has shown in Iraq and elsewhere, he thinks it just involves
people voting on a bunch of stuff. What a pathetic, simplistic vision of the
most glorious institution humans have ever created.
In his weekly radio address, Bush said "In our free society, people have the
right to choose how they live their lives." So far, so good. But he continued
that "in a free society, decisions about such a fundamental social institution
as marriage should be made by the people--not by the courts." He is dreadfully,
dangerously, demagogically wrong.
You don't put slavery up for a vote. You don't have a referendum on whether
women can drive, blacks can marry whites, or public school should be abolished.
We already have a wonderful set of rules that covers the basics. It's called
the Constitution, with its Bill of Rights. These rules guarantee certain liberties
to everyone, whether such rights for particular people (such as Japanese, Jews,
women, or blacks) are in or out of favor.
"Democracy, not court orders, should decide the future of marriage in America,"
says the President, who apparently doesn't realize the courts are part of the
democratic system. So Mr. Bush, here's how it has worked for over 200 years:
The courts exist to protect Americans when their elected representatives pass
laws that violate the rights we're all guaranteed--even when we ask for such
laws. Judges are responsible to the system, which is bigger than the current
passions of the people. Courts are how the system protects the people from their
own impulses (or the political manipulations of their representatives) that
would undermine the system the people depend on.
A president who disrespects the judicial system should be educated. If he's
one of those genial but unfortunate people who simply can't be educated, he
should be impeached, because he can't "preserve, protect, and defend" a system
that he doesn't understand.
3. Gay Marriage, of Course
The President's radio address, of course, was about same-gender
marriage. Bush, Frist, and millions of other people are terrified that letting
gays marry will somehow destroy the institution they say is the bedrock of civilization.
Well if heterosexual marriage can be destroyed by a bunch of gay couples honeymooning
in Niagara Falls or Key West, it's an institution so weak that nothing can save
it.
In referring to the terror of gays destroying everything-that-has-ever-mattered-to-anyone,
Bush also said "As this debate goes forward, we must remember that every American
deserves to be treated with tolerance, respect, and dignity. All of us have
a duty to conduct this discussion with civility and decency toward one another,
and all people deserve to have their voices heard." He means, of course, that
we shouldn't criticize those who want to destroy America to save it.
As The New Yorker's Steve Coll says about Bush this week in another context,
"we remain burdened by a president who believes passionately that he is at war,
and yet has only the most tenuous grasp of his enemy."
4. Dobson: Gay Marriage a "Force of Hell"
On his May 31 radio show, Focus on the Family Chairman James
Dobson said: "...as you all very well know, marriage is under vicious attack
now, I think from the forces of hell itself. And...with that, the decline of
Western civilization itself."
According to the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Dobson has also said that
same-sex marriage will destroy the U.S., destroy the earth, and is more important
than the war on terror. He also has compared marriage equality advocates to
Hitler and the attack on Pearl Harbor. (Yes, really.)
So will President Bush urge Dobson--a million-dollar supporter--to apologize
for failing to "conduct himself with civility and decency?"
5. Court Ends U.S. ‘International Gag Rule'
Our hero and good friend Phil Harvey has done it again. He has
sued the U.S., won, and forced some sexual sanity onto our government. Again.
In DKT International v. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID),
two different federal courts struck down the U.S. requirement that groups explicitly
oppose prostitution in order to receive grants for international family planning
and HIV-prevention activities. Both courts said the requirement violated groups'
First Amendment rights by requiring them to parrot the government's position.
Congressional conservatives had created the requirement in 2003 to both express
disapproval of sex work and, by default, make more money available to their
allies who promote abstinence.
But in the real world (including the U.S.), outreach to sex workers is crucial
in fighting HIV/AIDS and unplanned pregnancy. Requiring educational groups to
denounce prostitution would obviously hinder or prevent their activities.
Non-profit DKT International, which challenged the requirement, supports family
planning and HIV-prevention activities in 11 developing nations, distributing
hundreds of millions of condoms a year toward those ends--including to sex workers.
It has received many grants from the U.S. and foreign governments, international
organizations, and foundations. It neither opposes nor supports prostitution.
DKT President Phil Harvey called the decision "a major victory for DKT, for
free speech, and for the integrity and independence of private U.S. organizations."
District Judge Victor Marrero criticized the government's "somewhat cavalier
take-it-or-leave-it answer to an infringement of speech--which can more or less
be characterized as 'if you don't like it, lump it.'"
6. Senate Demands More Indecency (Fines)
Both houses of Congress have passed legislation to dramatically
increase fines against broadcasters that air "indecent," "profane" or violent
programs.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) has decided to champion the Senate
bill in a nakedly political move intended to appease conservative Republicans
as he prepares his 2008 presidential bid.
The FCC can currently levy fines of up to $32,500 for each "indecency" violation,
which is $32,500 too much. The Senate bill would authorize fines up to $325,000
per violation. The House, whose members run for election three times as often
as Senators, wants to authorize such fines up to $500,000 for each "dickhead"
or 1/2 second of nipple.
It's a disgusting new Congressional version of "my penis is bigger than yours,"
or "I hate Communism more than you do." The world's most powerful media can't
deliver news shows that actually educate Americans, but they are highly adept--and
eager--to scare everyone with unending stories of crime and perversion.
SI is firm in its belief that there should be no "decency" standards
in the electronic media as long as all TVs and radios come equipped with an
on-off switch.
However, if the government insists on fining the media for "indecency," they
might want to consider programs that:
Since the FCC is part of the real "indecency"
problem of the American media, it should be relegated back to the job it was
created to do, but has failed at miserably; encouraging diversity in programming.
The government of a free country has no business regulating the contect of the
mass media.
You may quote anything herein, with the
following attribution:
"Reprinted from Sexual Intelligence, copyright
© Marty Klein, Ph.D. (www.SexEd.org)."